Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.zued.ai/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

The Technical Score measures whether AI crawlers can actually reach and understand your content. It’s one of zued’s two primary KPIs — because perfectly aligned content is irrelevant if AI crawlers can’t access it. Technical issues always receive the highest priority in zued’s recommendation system. Fix them before any content changes.

Components

ComponentWeightWhat it checks
JS RenderingHighestHow much of your content is visible without JavaScript execution
Page PerformanceHighLCP, TTFB, FID/INP, CLS — page load speed, server response time, and stability
Bot AccessibilityHighrobots.txt rules and meta robots tags per AI crawler
Structured DataLowerPresence of Schema.org markup — only confirmed to help Copilot
Meta TagsLowerTitle tag and meta description presence
Total: 100 points. Components are weighted by their impact on AI crawler access. Some have circuit breakers — critical failures cap the maximum score regardless of other factors.

Score levels

ScoreWhat it means
90–100Excellent — AI crawlers can access and parse your content effectively
70–89Minor gaps — typically structured data or meta tag issues
50–69Crawlability affected — JS rendering or performance issues
< 50Critical problems — bot blocking or severe JS dependency

Bot accessibility

zued checks access individually for each AI crawler: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Bingbot, Google-Extended, and others. A single robots.txt rule or meta robots tag can block one engine while leaving others unaffected.
Blocking an AI crawler in robots.txt or via meta robots means zero visibility for that engine — regardless of content quality. zued flags these as Priority 100 issues.

JS rendering

If your content requires JavaScript to appear, some AI crawlers may never see it. zued compares your page before and after JavaScript execution and flags content that only appears post-render as a crawlability risk.

Server response time (TTFB)

Time to First Byte measures how quickly your server begins responding to a request. For AI visibility, this matters at the retrieval stage: when an AI engine’s crawler requests your page, a slow server response reduces the number of pages it can fetch within its crawl budget and may cause it to deprioritize your domain entirely. Pages with consistently slow server response times are less likely to enter the candidate pool that AI engines draw from when generating answers. zued measures TTFB and applies score caps when response times are high enough to impact crawl efficiency. Target response times:
TTFBAssessment
< 200msOptimal — meets Google’s recommended server response time and keeps pages eligible for tight AI retrieval windows
200–500msAcceptable for most scenarios, but may miss retrieval windows during high-concurrency fan-out queries
> 500msLikely to trigger crawl rate throttling and reduce the number of your pages that AI engines can fetch
Google recommends a server response time under 200ms. For AI crawlers, this target is even more important: LLM retrieval operates under strict latency budgets during real-time search, and sites with fast response times receive significantly more crawler requests than slower sites.

Structured data

Structured data (Schema.org) is confirmed to assist Copilot’s understanding. Its direct benefit for ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini citation behavior is not established. zued scores its presence accurately for what it affects.